# Wonder — review-card studies v7

Two 1080×1080 square design studies, using the operator’s supplied screenshot directly as visual direction. Built-in imagegen generated two photo plates; HTML/Playwright added deterministic typography. These are new invented people and explicitly AI-illustrated comparisons, not customer results. No fabricated testimonials, verified-buyer badges, treatment dates or ratings.

W71: “Growing it out. Watching it break.” Closeups of hands holding thin/frayed versus fuller-looking ends, with different clothes and hand positions. Cosmetic care bridge: rich batana-oil care for dry lengths.

W72: “The part you keep checking.” Overhead part-line appearance comparison. The illustration is not evidence that Wonder grows hair or changes scalp density. Product copy describes scalp care and 100% batana oil.

The reference’s compact header/body and dominant side-by-side hair details are adopted. Photographs remain cleaner and more consistent than the original amateur examples. This is a direction to review, not a claim that synthetic snapshots equal real UGC. Real customer photographs and attributable reviews are needed for a genuine testimonial execution.

No fresh Foreplay pull this revision: direct operator reference and previously captured G07/G08 evidence. No spend, ROAS, or winning-ad claims. Producer visual review only; no independent judge or numerical score. Square studies are not a complete 4:5 and 9:16 launch package. No platform or production actions.

References: [G07 / ends](https://app.foreplay.co/discovery?ad=8uVQVm7nocptWXljlHwb), [G08 / scalp](https://app.foreplay.co/discovery?ad=E1NYLyBu8SjoxUz0Ouk5).

Prompts and source plates are included in the ZIP alongside the final PNGs and editable HTML.